<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stack Trace in Linux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thisnerdheard.com/2007/06/22/stack-trace-in-linux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thisnerdheard.com/index.php/2007/06/22/stack-trace-in-linux/</link>
	<description>Ramblings of a computer geek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 19:30:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ejohnson</title>
		<link>http://www.thisnerdheard.com/index.php/2007/06/22/stack-trace-in-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>ejohnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 09:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thisnerdheard.com/index.php/2007/06/22/stack-trace-in-linux/#comment-144</guid>
		<description>For several reasons.  I had a similar error occuring twice during startup of my application and I was trying to find out the call stack in both cases.  I wanted to see the callstack in both locations and wouldn&#039;t have been able to do that at once had I forced a crash and looked through a core file.

Likewise, stepping through code with GDB isn&#039;t always the most convenient thing to do when multiple source files are involved.  So, why not just print out the stack myself?

Also, what if an non-critical error condition occurs and I want to have a stack trace but contnue execution? I can log this, recover from the error, and continue execution.  Then I can go back later and figure out what went wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For several reasons.  I had a similar error occuring twice during startup of my application and I was trying to find out the call stack in both cases.  I wanted to see the callstack in both locations and wouldn&#8217;t have been able to do that at once had I forced a crash and looked through a core file.</p>
<p>Likewise, stepping through code with GDB isn&#8217;t always the most convenient thing to do when multiple source files are involved.  So, why not just print out the stack myself?</p>
<p>Also, what if an non-critical error condition occurs and I want to have a stack trace but contnue execution? I can log this, recover from the error, and continue execution.  Then I can go back later and figure out what went wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.thisnerdheard.com/index.php/2007/06/22/stack-trace-in-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 03:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thisnerdheard.com/index.php/2007/06/22/stack-trace-in-linux/#comment-143</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s cool!

Why not run it through gdb?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s cool!</p>
<p>Why not run it through gdb?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

