Archive for the ‘Rants and Raves’ Category

Video games & Language

Friday, September 29th, 2006

This must be advocate week, because I am about to suggest that people support another cause (besides sports & drug use).

Back in 2000 or so, I started playing the game Perfect Dark on the Nintendo 64.  I had played Golden Eye and thought it was awesome, but it took me a while to get into the new features of Perfect Dark.  In the end, I thought it was an awesome game, and believe it has few rivals in the FPS arena.

In 2005, with the release of the Xbox 360, Perfect Dark Zero was released.  The games had a lot of similarities, and I rather enjoy that game also.  There was one major difference between the two games, however.  In Perfect Dark, you could enable/disable foul language.  In PD Zero, you cannot.  I did not understand why they would remove such a feature.  I find that the language does not add to the game at all, but only detracts.

So how much work is it for them to allow people to enable/disable such language? Well, if designed into the software from day one, the majority of the work is done by the actors/voice people.  They just have to record extra audio.  The software end is rather simple, they just choose one set of audio files over another.  They could have the exact same names between the censored and uncensored clips, so that they could easily play the right clip.

Why don’t video games support this? Is it because they think it adds realism to the game? Perhaps it does, but the language can be offensive to people who might otherwise play the game.  For instance, I have known parents who will let their child play Tony Hawk in free skate, but not in campaign mode because of language.  Or they can play multiplayer Halo (with friends, not on the net) but not single player.  So, it is not that the parents object to the theme of the game, but they object to the language.

So the question is, does the language increase sales or diminsh them? I suggest that it would tend to diminish them.  And does giving the end user the chance to choose how they experience the game diminish sales? No, I would expect that to increase sales.  It would be incredibly easy to accomplish.  In fact, the Xbox 360 allows parents to select what type of environment their children are exposed to.  This extends from movies ratings, to online matchmaking, to specific game ratings.  When I play Xbox 360 games on Xbox live, for instance, I am placed with people in the “family” match making list.  This is because I don’t like to hear screaming and cursing children when I am trying to enjoy a game.  Game developers could harness that potential and automatically censor language in their games.

So what can you do about it? If you feel the way I do, write your favorite cosole manufacturers, your favorite software companies, and maybe even your country’s version of the ESRB (electronic software rating board, I believe).  Maybe if enough people give their two cents, these people will take advantage of the capabilities they have.

Professional sports, drug use, and records

Saturday, September 23rd, 2006

Well, I found out that today Barry Bonds has passed Hank Aaron’s NL home run hitting record.  This isn’t his career record, Bonds hasn’t passed that yet.  He’s still 31 homeruns behind.  But, this has reminded me of the whole Balco scandal, and the fact that Barry Bonds definitely used illegal performance enhancing substances.

It really irritates me that Major League Baseball (MLB) has not stepped up and announced that Barry Bond’s will be ineligible for the record.  It is impossible to know how many seasons, and homeruns, that Barry Bonds used while on performance enhancing drugs.  In fact, I would be surprised if Barry Bonds is not taking performance enhancing drugs now.

So why is baseball allowing him to continue his home run hitting trek?  Are they really going to replace Hank Aaron in the record books with a known cheater?  How is his drug use any better than Pete Rose’s gambling scandal?  It is worse, if you ask me.  Worse because thousands of atheletes throughout the world now feel that they have to use drugs in order to compete with people like Barry.

I intend to write the baseball commissioner and tell him how I feel.  It would be nice if others, who feel the same way, did likewise.  We cannot allow professional sports to ignore the issue.  All sports should behave in the same manner as International Cycling.  I believe that writing your local Congressional representative and letting them know how you feel would be useful also.

Here is the contact information for baseball’s commissioner:

Allan H. (Bud) Selig, Commissioner
245 Park Avenue, 31st Floor
New York, NY 10167
Phone: (212) 931-7800

Changing of the guard… err sort of

Wednesday, September 6th, 2006

Alright, my contract with a large telecom company here in the U.S. that has been providing me with DSL is about to end.  I have already gotten cable modem installed by a large cable company.  I haven’t even started using it yet because it means I’ll have to make a few minor changes in the settings for my smtp server.  But, I need to do that tonight or else I will be paying way too much for DSL and won’t even be using the cable modem.

So why exactly did I switch? One of the main reasons is because large corporations in the U.S. now reward you for customer disloyalty.  In otherwords, if I switched my cell phone service, high speed internet service, and cable/satellite service every single time my contract expires, I get a much better deal on my new service.  But if I don’t cancel, they raise my rates after my contract ends and don’t give me the same deals they offer to new customers.  Is there any difference in the quality of service? Sometimes there is, but usually the differences are not very noticable.

But I digress.  This was just supposed to indicate that I was switching ISPs.  Hopefully that won’t cause any extra outages.

Why I won’t be renewing my Internet w/ AT&T

Wednesday, August 2nd, 2006

I seem to have a habit of discussing old news but this actually came up at lunch today with my friends.  I have a friend who repeatedly gets emails from a friend of his attacking President Bush.  So, naturally we started talking politics.

I’m a conservative person and I tend to lean towards the Republican platform.  I can’t say that I agree with everything they believe in, but it suits me better than the democratic party.

That being said, however, I completely disagree with what President Bush has allowed the NSA to do.  They may only be spying on people who are emailing and calling international people, but it does not matter. 

People have the right to privacy.  The fact of the matter is that this widespread invasion of privacy is going to push people towards encryption, which is only going to further hinder the government.

But people ought to be able to call and email their friends, family, and business relations without fear of eavesdropping. This could very easily be a stepping stone into monitoring all communcations, domestic and international.

My lovely ISP has embraced the government with open arms and has been freely providing all that they ask for without a court order.  That is wrong. AT&T should be protecting the privacy of their customers and not bowing to government pressure.

People argue that they have nothing to hide.  Well, if that is the case, may I please have your social security number, mother’s maiden name, date of birth, and all of your credit card numbers and expiration dates? Oh did you want to hide that from me? What if I worked for the government? Then you might not be able to hide that from me.

RIAA Lawsuit

Monday, July 31st, 2006

I know this is old news, but I just stumbled upon it.  I guess the RIAA filed a suit against a mother from Oklahoma requesting damages for file sharing.  The case has been dismissed.

I’m glad to see this.  An IP address alone is not enough to find someone liable in a civil suit.  I don’t even think having them on a computer should be enough.

If John Smith has his home network connected to the Internet, he could have a half a dozen or more computers available for someone to pwn.  Any script kiddie or hacker on the net could take control of his network and use his box to fileshare without putting themself in risk.  Likely they’d make John Smith’s computer(s) a server spewing out malware and warez.  Why should John Smith be liable just because someone stored some files on his computer?

Now if you can show that he didn’t get pwned and is using the files, maybe you have some merit.  But I don’t think the RIAA or anyone else ought to be able to snoop around on someone’s computer because they can’t adapt their business model to the digital world.

RFID is great!

Friday, July 14th, 2006

Just ask your favorite State Department worker.  In fact, it is so great, they are going to start putting them in passports by the end of next month (http://money.cnn.com/2006/07/13/pf/rfid_passports/index.htm).  Coming soon to an airport near you, you can just waive your passport in front of their reader and they will have all your information.  Sounds great right? Saves you that pesky 2 seconds it takes for the person at the desk to actually open your passport up.  After a mere 43,200 passport scans, you will have saved an entire day of your life!  Kind of makes me want to take up international travel again.

 But seriously.  This is the stupidest idea ever.  Do the people at the State department not read the news?  The Dutch government tried the same thing just one year ago.  Their encryption was cracked in something like two weeks.  Not only that, but people with readers could obtain a person’s passport information as it was scanned at immigration from something on the order of 50 feet away.  The Dutch government corrected that problem by putting (I believe) Gaussian cages around the passport readers.  But, what’s to stop someone from energizing your RFID chip as you walk through the door to their business or something? 

The encryption the State Department intends to use will get broken someday.  Then your RFID passport could be a liability.  They claim the purpose of the chip is to cut down on human error but a human is reviewing the information on a computer screen instead of a passport.  Are they less likely to make an error looking at a computer screen? I doubt it.

The Internet is Broken!

Thursday, July 13th, 2006

I can’t connect, so it must be broken. I’ve seriously had people tell me that.  Anyway, that’s not why it is broken.  It’s broken because I’ve looked through my log files and I get hit by robots all the time.  I haven’t posted my domain name anywhere or anything.  These robots started scouring my site within hours of it going live.  I have no idea if these robots are malicious or not, and if they were a mere robots.txt file isn’t going to stop them.  I suppose it’s not bad that people want to find useful information on websites but it is just sad that you can’t even go a few hours without them finding you.

But the main reason the internet is broken is things like spam email.  I think that most people agree that the internet ought to continue to provie some measure of anonymity, but no one likes to receive spam.  Worse, no one likes someone to send spam with their email address being the return address on the message.  It makes them look bad.  So how do we preserve the sanctity of email and the anonymity that everyone wants? I fear they may be conflicting.  But, I’ve been thinking about solutions.  I am sure I am not the only one trying to find a solution. I’m not sure it is possible to provide both aspects of email though.  I think they are too opposite from each other.  Maybe some day we can fix the internet.

 -Edit: I forgot to mention that it seems the FBI wants to put in a backdoor to everyone’s internet connection (http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/node/1671).  That would break the internet even more.  That’s just sillines and not something that would even be able to overcome encryption.